Metro Denver Title LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
| Metro Denver Title LLC doing business as First Integrity Title Company and Metro Denver Title LLC a Colorado limited liability company doing business as First Integrity Title Company |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA |
| 1:2021cv02705 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. In light of its unopposed nature, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Motion. Accordingly, Defendant has up to, and including, 12-6-2021 to answer or otherwise respond. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 11-19-2021. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Carter, Gregory) |
|
Filing 8
Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 1-5-2022 at 10:30 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, 7 days before the Telephonic Scheduling Conference (on or before 12-29-2021). The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#4-1] is due 12-29-2021. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 11-8-2021. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA answer due 11/22/2021. (Carter, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Gregory Scott Carter on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank, NAAttorney Gregory Scott Carter added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA(pty:dft) (Carter, Gregory) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ronald J. Tomassi, Jr on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank, NAAttorney Ronald J. Tomassi, Jr added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA(pty:dft) (Tomassi, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:Joseph A. Murr.Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8112639)Attorney Joseph A. Murr added to party Metro Denver Title LLC(pty:pla), filed by Metro Denver Title LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Payoff Quote), #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 (April 5, 2021 Altered Payoff), #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 (Wire Confirmation), #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Summons)(Murr, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
