Dorn v. Facebook et al
| Thomas James Dorn |
| Facebook, Ok Cupid, Bumble, Tinder, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion |
| 1:2021cv02717 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order of Dismissal on 11/17/2021. (athom, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to prosecute and cure the deficiencies as directed. IFP on appeal denied without prejudice. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/17/2021. (athom, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 10/8/2021. (evana, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bumble, Equifax, Experian, Facebook, Ok Cupid, Tinder, TransUnion, filed by Thomas James Dorn. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document)(cpomm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
