PopSockets LLC v. Flygrip, Inc.
| PopSockets LLC |
| Flygrip, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv02900 |
| October 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Stay pending Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) by Defendant Flygrip, Inc.. (Katz, Robert) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the alternative, to Transfer by Defendant Flygrip, Inc.. (Katz, Robert) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by PopSockets LLC. Flygrip, Inc. served on 11/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. (Sayres, Joel) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond until 12/23/2021, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/12/2021. Text Only Entry(stvlc1, )
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Katz, Robert) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Flygrip, Inc.. (Katz, Robert) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ELECTION CONCERNING CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION FORM AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 29 October 2021. Consent Form due by 1/4/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/11/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 1/18/2022 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 5 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (cpomm, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Sayres, Joel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,844,098, 10,406,671, 10,800,024, and 10,953,535 against Flygrip, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8150935)Attorney Joel David Sayres added to party PopSockets LLC(pty:pla), filed by PopSockets LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Summons)(Sayres, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PopSockets LLC v. Flygrip, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PopSockets LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joel David Sayres |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Flygrip, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert David Katz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
