McHone et al v. Roney Law Firm, P.C.
Angela McHone and Mitchell McHone |
Roney Law Firm, P.C. |
1:2021cv02901 |
October 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Michael E Hegarty |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Stay all Deadlines by Plaintiffs Angela McHone, Mitchell McHone (Marco, David) |
![]() |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Larry Paul Smith on behalf of Angela McHone, Mitchell McHoneAttorney Larry Paul Smith added to party Angela McHone(pty:pla), Attorney Larry Paul Smith added to party Mitchell McHone(pty:pla) (Smith, Larry) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David Michael Marco on behalf of Angela McHone, Mitchell McHone (Marco, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Roney Law Firm, P.C. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8151000)Attorney David Michael Marco added to party Angela McHone(pty:pla), Attorney David Michael Marco added to party Mitchell McHone(pty:pla), filed by Angela McHone, Mitchell McHone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Marco, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.