McHone et al v. Roney Law Firm, P.C.
Plaintiff: Angela McHone and Mitchell McHone
Defendant: Roney Law Firm, P.C.
Case Number: 1:2021cv02901
Filed: October 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Michael E Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3 December 2021. Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Notice of Settlement and Request to Stay All Deadlines.ECF #7 . In light of the parties' settlement, the parties shall file dismissal papers on or before January 3, 2022. Additionally, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for January 6, 2022 is vacated. All other deadlines are stayed pending further order of the Court. (cmadr, )
December 2, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Stay all Deadlines by Plaintiffs Angela McHone, Mitchell McHone (Marco, David)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1 November 2021. Consent Form due by 12/23/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/30/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 1/6/2022 10:15 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
October 29, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, )
October 29, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
October 29, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Larry Paul Smith on behalf of Angela McHone, Mitchell McHoneAttorney Larry Paul Smith added to party Angela McHone(pty:pla), Attorney Larry Paul Smith added to party Mitchell McHone(pty:pla) (Smith, Larry)
October 29, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David Michael Marco on behalf of Angela McHone, Mitchell McHone (Marco, David)
October 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Roney Law Firm, P.C. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8151000)Attorney David Michael Marco added to party Angela McHone(pty:pla), Attorney David Michael Marco added to party Mitchell McHone(pty:pla), filed by Angela McHone, Mitchell McHone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Marco, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McHone et al v. Roney Law Firm, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela McHone
Represented By: Larry Paul Smith
Represented By: David Michael Marco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitchell McHone
Represented By: Larry Paul Smith
Represented By: David Michael Marco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roney Law Firm, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?