Bowling v. DaVita, Inc.
| James Bowling |
| DaVita, INC. |
| 1:2021cv03033 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Kristen L Mix |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on December 28, 2021. This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extensionof Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint #13 (the "Motion"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion #13 is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the operative complaint no later than January 11, 2022.(csarr, )
|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM regarding #13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by DaVita, Inc.. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/23/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, ) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant DaVita, Inc.. (Chacon, Raul) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant DaVita, Inc.. DaVita, Inc. answer due 12/28/2021. (Bell, Michael) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/29/2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 2/10/2022. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 2/17/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document) (alave, )
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Bowling. DaVita, Inc. served on 11/16/2021, answer due 12/7/2021. (Prieto, Ricardo) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (trvo, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2020 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11 /15/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Magistrate Judge Mix, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/15/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to DaVita, Inc by Plaintiff James Bowling. (Prieto, Ricardo) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (norlin, ) Modified on 11/23/2021 to correct file date (norlin, ). |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) Modified on 11/23/2021 to correct file date (norlin, ). |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Plaintiff James Bowling. (Arbuckle, Melinda) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Consent Forms by Plaintiff James Bowling (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - Barbee Consent, #2 Exhibit 3 - Clay Consent, #3 Exhibit 4 - Grant Consent, #4 Exhibit 5 - Kennedy Consent, #5 Exhibit 6 - Quiroz Consent, #6 Exhibit 7 - Stewart Consent)(Prieto, Ricardo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DaVita, INC. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8171755)Attorney Ricardo J. Prieto added to party James Bowling(pty:pla), filed by James Bowling. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Bowling Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Prieto, Ricardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bowling v. DaVita, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Bowling | |
| Represented By: | Ricardo J. Prieto |
| Represented By: | Melinda Arbuckle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DaVita, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Raul Chacon, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Michael H. Bell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
