Bocanegra v. Arepas House, LLC et al
| Len Bocanegra |
| Arepas House, LLC and Jorge A. Dominguez |
| 1:2021cv03087 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Edward Levy on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Edward Levy added to party Arepas House, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Edward Levy added to party Jorge A. Dominguez(pty:dft) (Levy, Edward)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Len Bocanegra. Jorge A. Dominguez served on 12/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. (Sanford, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Len Bocanegra. Arepas House, LLC served on 12/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. (Sanford, Joshua)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 22 November 2021. Proposed Scheduling Order due 2/22/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 3/1/2022 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2020 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11 /22/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Magistrate Judge Neureiter, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/22/2021. Text Only Entry (wjmsec, )
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (cpomm, )
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (cpomm, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Arepas House, LLC, Jorge A. Dominguez (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8182829)Attorney Joshua J. Sanford added to party Len Bocanegra(pty:pla), filed by Len Bocanegra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons -- Arepas House, LLC, #3 Summons Summons -- Jorge A. Dominguez)(Sanford, Joshua)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
