Munoz v. Soll
| Baudelio Munoz |
| Edward Soll |
| 1:2021cv03262 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 25 January 2022. The Scheduling Order is amended to show that the Final Pretrial Conference set for November 16, 2022 starts at 1:00 pm (and not 1:00 am). No other changes were made. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 25 January 2022. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 17 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 1/24/2022. FTR: A501. (cthom, ) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #14 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/20/2022. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Edward Soll. (Volker, Luke) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Edward Soll All parties consent.. (Volker, Luke) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance as Counsel for Plaintiff by Michael Paul Fossenier on behalf of Baudelio MunozAttorney Michael Paul Fossenier added to party Baudelio Munoz(pty:pla) (Fossenier, Michael) |
|
Filing 12
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 22 December 2021. Consent Form due by 1/14/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/17/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 1/24/2022 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE COMPLETE DIVERSITY re #10 by Defendant Edward Soll. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9)(Dagner, Deana) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/07/2021. It is ORDERED that Defendant shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause on or before December 21, 2021, demonstrating why the Court should not remand this case (or recommend that it be remanded) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (jtorr, )
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #5 Complaint and Jury Demand by Edward Soll.(Dagner, Deana) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 7 STATE COURT ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Thrid Motion for Enlargement of Time to Complete Service on Defendant Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 6(b)by Boulder County District Court Judge Andrew Hartman on 11/03/2021. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 6 STATE COURT ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Complete Service on Defendant Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 6(b)by Boulder County District Court Judge Andrew Hartman on 09/02/2021.. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Edward Soll, filed by Baudelio Munoz.(norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Luke James Volker on behalf of Edward SollAttorney Luke James Volker added to party Edward Soll(pty:dft) (Volker, Luke) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Edward Soll from Boulder District Court, Case Number 2021CV30501. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8209359), filed by Edward Soll. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Dagner, Deana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Munoz v. Soll | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Baudelio Munoz | |
| Represented By: | Michael Paul Fossenier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Edward Soll | |
| Represented By: | Luke James Volker |
| Represented By: | Deana R. Dagner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
