Jones v. US Marshal et al
| Georgiana Jones |
| US Marshal, Denver City Jail, US District Court and USA |
| 1:2021cv03371 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 1/27/2022. (sphil, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The "Motion to Dismiss Federal Hold/Vacate Hold" (ECF No. 1) is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Petitioner failed to prosecute and cure the deficiencies as directed, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/27/2022. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Petitioner files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 12/16/2021. (evana, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 1 Motion to Dismiss Federal Hold/ Vacate Hold, filed by Georgiana Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jcharl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
