Lumen Employee Benefits Committee v. Smith et al
| Lumen Employee Benefits Committee |
| Robbin Smith and Leventhal Puga Braley P.C. |
| 1:2021cv03484 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kristen L Mix |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, #6 Summons Returned Executed. Defendant Leventhal Puga Braley P.C. is GRANTED an extension of time, to and including 2/8/2022, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's #1 Complaint. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 1/25/2022. Text Only Entry(rmrja)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, #6 Summons Returned Executed by Defendant Leventhal Puga Braley P.C.. (Braley, Bruce) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lumen Employee Benefits Committee. Leventhal Puga Braley P.C. served on 1/4/2022, answer due 1/25/2022. (Kolb, John) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on January 6, 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/2/2022 Scheduling Conference set for 3/9/2022 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (csarr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M Rodriguez on 1/4/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Regina M Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Leventhal Puga Braley P.C., Robbin Smith (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8245492)Attorney John D. Kolb added to party Lumen Employee Benefits Committee(pty:pla), filed by Lumen Employee Benefits Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Relevant Plan Language, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Robbin Smith, #4 Summons Leventhal Puga Braley P.C.)(Kolb, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
