Gomez v. Spadafore, et al
| Jessica Gomez |
| Chelsea Spadafore and Ecolab Inc. |
| 1:2021cv03486 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order Amended by Plaintiff Jessica Gomez. (Roberts, Steve) |
| Filing 16 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendants Ecolab Inc., Chelsea Spadafore. (Harris, Mark) |
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER Resetting Scheduling Conference. Due to a conflict on the Court's calendar, the Telephonic Scheduling Conference is RESET for 3/2/2022 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, no later than seven calendar days before the conference. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 1/27/2022. Text Only Entry (amont, )
|
| Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Ecolab Inc., Chelsea Spadafore All parties do not consent.. (Harris, Mark) |
| Filing 13 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES re: #9 Answer to Complaint filed by attorney Manda Leigh Neuman. The s/ signature did not match the filers name on the account for which the login and password are registered. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(c) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (rvill, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Steve J. Roberts on behalf of Jessica GomezAttorney Steve J. Roberts added to party Jessica Gomez(pty:pla) (Roberts, Steve) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Chelsea Spadafore.(Harris, Mark) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER Setting Telephone Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 2/22/2022 11:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, no later than seven calendar days before the conference. At the scheduled time, counsel shall call the Court provided conference line at (888) 251-2909 Access Code: 5662814#. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 1/4/2022. Text Only Entry (amont, )
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #5 Complaint by Ecolab Inc..(Neuman, Manda) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Manda Leigh Neuman on behalf of Ecolab Inc., Chelsea SpadaforeAttorney Manda Leigh Neuman added to party Ecolab Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Manda Leigh Neuman added to party Chelsea Spadafore(pty:dft) (Neuman, Manda) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M Rodriguez on 12/29/2021. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND against Ecolab Inc., Chelsea Spadafore, filed by Jessica Gomez.(norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Regina M Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Evans Harris on behalf of Ecolab Inc., Chelsea Spadafore (Harris, Mark) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ecolab Inc., Chelsea Spadafore from Boulder County, District Court, Case Number 2021CV30878. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8245774), filed by Ecolab Inc., Chelsea Spadafore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Harris, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
