Crumley v. Gonzalez-Gonzalez et al
| Morgan Crumley |
| Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Uber Technologies, Inc. a Foreign Corporation doing business as Uber and Rasier, LLC Limited Liability Company doing business as Uber |
| 1:2021cv03499 |
| December 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Party Rasier, LLC (Limited Liability Company) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (a Foreign Corporation) terminated pursuant to #20 on 31 January 2022. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Party by Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Ellenberger, Laura) |
| Filing 19 ANSWER to #4 Complaint with Jury Demand by Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez.(Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE Entry of Appearance by Plaintiff Morgan Crumley (McBride, William) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Ellenberger, Laura) |
| Filing 16 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #13 Notice of Entry of Appearance and #12 Notice of Entry of Appearance, filed by attorneys Laura J. Ellenberger & Jane B. Lucero. Attorneys have used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature followed by a complete signature block to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Rasier, LLC.(Ellenberger, Laura) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Ellenberger, Laura) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jane B. Lucero on behalf of Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.Attorney Jane B. Lucero added to party Rasier, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Jane B. Lucero added to party Uber Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft) (Lucero, Jane) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Laura J. Ellenberger on behalf of Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.Attorney Laura J. Ellenberger added to party Rasier, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Laura J. Ellenberger added to party Uber Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft) (Ellenberger, Laura) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint and Jury Demand by Defendant Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez. Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez answer due 1/27/2022. (Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Service by mail by Clerk of Court re #9 Order, to William McBride, c/o William McBride Law Group, P.C., 12250 East Iliff Ave, Suite 300, Aurora, CO 80014. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 5 January 2022. Consent Form due by 3/1/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/8/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 3/15/2022 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 8 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #7 Memorandum. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-03499-NRN. (Text Only Entry) (sdunb, ) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/03/2022. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 21-cv-03499-LTB. (sdunb, ) Modified on 1/4/2022 to include Judge Lewis T. Babcock Assigned in Error (sdunb, ). |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Case Cover Sheet, Summons - Defendant Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Complaint with Jury Demand upon Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez on 12/03/2021 (norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc., filed by Morgan Crumley.(norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez from Boulder County Combined Court, Case Number 2021CV30855. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8247387), filed by Freddy Gonzalez-Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint and Jury Demand, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit Summons, #5 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schneider, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
