Wright et al v. Aspen Airport-ASE et al
| Lashawnda Wright and Bernard Myles Albury |
| Snowmass, Aspen Airport: ASE, Aspen Airport-ASE, Aspen Skiing Company, LLC, Aspen Snowmass and Silvertree Propco, LLC a Delaware Corporation; and John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, and John Does 4 to 10 doing business as Wildwood Snowmass |
| 1:2022cv00077 |
| January 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11 March 2022. Based on the service of process dates (ECF #9 ; ECF #10 ), and at Plaintiff's emailed request, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) scheduling conference set for March 22, 2022 is vacated and rescheduled for April 18, 2022, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF 6-3) on or before April 5, 2022. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bernard Myles Albury, Lashawnda Wright. Snowmass served on 3/8/2022, answer due 3/29/2022. (Riegerix, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bernard Myles Albury, Lashawnda Wright. Aspen Airport-ASE served on 3/8/2022, answer due 3/29/2022. (Riegerix, Joseph) |
|
Filing 8
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 18 February 2022. This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Due to a conflict on the Court's calendar, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) scheduling conference set for March 23, 2022 is vacated and rescheduled for March 22, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form (ECF #3 ) on or before March 9, 2022. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 7
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 19 January 2022. As an initial matter, the Motion to Reopen Case #3 is granted, since the case was closed due to an inadvertent error in Plaintiffs' counsel's access to filling through the CM/ECF system. It is further ORDERED that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) scheduling conference shall be held on March 23, 2022, at 12:30 p.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form on or before March 10, 2022.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8269902), filed by Bernard Myles Albury, Lashawnda Wright. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Riegerix, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Reopen Case by Plaintiffs Bernard Myles Albury, Lashawnda Wright. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Riegerix, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Civil Case Terminated. Text Only Entry. (jsalz, ) |
| Filing 1 Administrative Notice: No initiating document. Attorney contacted with instructions to file the initiating document within 24 hours. (Text Only Entry) (jsalz, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
