Doe v. T-Mobile et al
| Jane Doe and John Doe |
| T-Mobile, Wireless Vision Technologies, LLC and Kevin Moreno-Gabino |
| 1:2022cv00158 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Scott T Varholak |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons Issued. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:Brian Keith Hugen. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Joint Complaint & Jury Demand against T-Mobile, Wireless Vision Technologies, LLC, Kevin Moreno-Gabino, Corporate Does (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8276223)Attorney Gregory A. Gold added to party Jane Doe(pty:pla), filed by Jane Doe.(Gold, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
