Wright v. ACT et al
Charles A. Wright |
ACT and Executive Director |
1:2022cv00211 |
January 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
Gordon P Gallagher |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 3/9/2022. (sphil, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies and failure to prosecute. ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED without prejudice. ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/9/2022. (sphil, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies. If Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 1/27/2022. (sphil, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
Filing 1 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action. by Petitioner Charles A. Wright. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(norlin, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.