Dohrman v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Corey Dohrman |
| Social Security Commissioner and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing |
| 1:2022cv00334 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Marcia S Krieger |
| Social Security - SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Corey Dohrman All parties consent.. (Linerud, Rory) |
| Filing 10 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Commissioner, Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document, #4 Continuation of Main Document, #5 Continuation of Main Document, #6 Continuation of Main Document, #7 Continuation of Main Document, #8 Continuation of Main Document, #9 Continuation of Main Document, #10 Continuation of Main Document)(Pedderson, Danielle) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. By Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/28/22. Text Only Entry(msklc2, )
|
| Filing 8 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Corey Dohrman. (Linerud, Rory) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis: Although the Court appreciates counsel's candor and the unusual circumstances faced by both counsel and the Plaintiff in this case, a request to proceed in forma pauperis requires a complete, accurate, and signed financial affidavit from the Plaintiff. Mr. Dhorman's current affidavit is both unsigned and, according to his counsel, inaccurate in certain respects. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. In recognition of the unusual circumstances of this case, the Court will grant Mr. Dhorman 21 days from the date of this Order to file an amended financial affidavit. Failure to file an adequate affidavit by that date (or, in the alternative, to pay the filing fee) will result in this appeal being dismissed without prejudice. By Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/7/22. Text Only Entry(msklc2, )
|
| Filing 6 Utility Setting Answer Deadline: Commissioner, Social Security Administration answer due 4/4/2022. Text Only Entry. (sdunb, ) |
| Filing 5 Administrative Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to the Letter of Agreement signed by the Clerk, U.S. District Court;U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Colorado (USAO), and Social Security Administration (SSA), service of the initiating document(s) by the plaintiff to the SSA, the U.S. Attorney General, and USAO in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) is not necessary unless the court otherwise orders. A summons is not required and will not be issued. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Corey Dohrman. (Linerud, Rory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Commissioner Attorney Rory Joseph Linerud added to party Corey Dohrman(pty:pla), filed by Corey Dohrman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Linerud, Rory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
