State National Insurance Company et al v. Carlin
| State National Insurance Company and Next Insurance Company |
| Robert Carlin dba Handyman Can All Trades Construction and Robert Carlin an individual doing business as Handyman Can All Trades Construction |
| 1:2022cv00399 |
| February 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (sdunb, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Robert Carlin dba Handyman Can All Trades Construction by Plaintiffs Next Insurance Company, State National Insurance Company. (Zouski, Justin) |
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on February 15, 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/11/2022 Scheduling Conference set for 5/18/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. (csarr, )
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/15/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 2/15/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons Issued. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Robert Carlin dba Handyman Can All Trades Construction (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8317826)Attorney Justin Hans Zouski added to party Next Insurance Company(pty:pla), Attorney Justin Hans Zouski added to party State National Insurance Company(pty:pla), filed by State National Insurance Company, Next Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zouski, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
