Duzik et al v. Moffat County et al
| Robert E Duzik and Marie Birch Duzik |
| Moffat County, Jay Cranmer, Rebecca Tyree, State of CO, Sandra Gardner, Michael O'Hara, Shauna Merrill, Shauna (I) Merrill, Jay (I) Cranmer, Rebecca (I) Tyree, Sandra (I) Gardner and Michael (I) O'hara |
| 1:2022cv00635 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
THIRD ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. Any papers that Plaintiffs file in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall obtain the Court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. Plaintiffs must use this form in curing the filing deficiencies. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiffs fail to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the #8 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 is denied without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 04/14/2022. (sdunb, )
|
| Filing 8 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiffs Marie Birch Duzik, Robert E Duzik. (sdunb, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jay Cranmer, Sandra Gardner, Moffat County, Michael O'Hara, State of CO, Rebecca Tyree, filed by Robert E Duzik, Marie Birch Duzik.(sdunb, ) |
|
Filing 6
SECOND ORDER Directing Plaintiffs' to Cure Deficiencies. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. ORDERED that the #5 the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. 5) is DENIED without prejudice by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/6/2022.. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 5 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiffs Marie Birch Duzik, Robert E Duzik. (sdunb, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jay Cranmer, Sandra Gardner, Moffat County, Michael O'Hara, State of CO, Rebecca Tyree, filed by Robert E Duzik, Marie Birch Duzik.(sdunb, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO CURE DEFICIENCIES, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiffs file in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiffs fail to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 03/21/2022. (sdunb, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights against Jay Cranmer, Sandra Gardner, Moffat County, Michael O'Hara, State of CO, and Rebecca Tyree, filed by Robert E Duzik and Marie Birch Duzik.(tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
