Crump v. No Named Respondent
Petitioner: Norvell Webster Crump
Respondent: No Named Defendant and No Named Respondent
Case Number: 1:2022cv00657
Filed: March 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2022 Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #7 Order of Dismissal on 04/26/2022. (athom, )
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a Court order to cure deficiencies. IFP on appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 04/26/2022. (athom, )
April 6, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by Petitioner Norvell Webster Crump (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(angar, )
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 04/01/2022. Applicant is remined that this habeas corpus action will be dismissed without further notice if he fails to comply with the order to cure on or before April 18, 2022. On March 30, 2022, Applicant filed a motion (ECF No. #4 ) requesting "42 USC 1983 documents for filing." Applicant is advised that 1983 claims cannot be brought in a habeas corpus action. See generally Palma-Salazar v. Davis, 677 F.3d 1031, 1035 (10th Cir. 2012) (discussing distinction between habeas corpus claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and conditions of confinement claims raised in civil rights actions). If Applicant wishes to pursue any 1983 claims and relief, he must file a new action. (athom, )
March 30, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION by Petitioner Norvell Webster Crump. (athom, )
March 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. If Applicant fails to cure all the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 03/17/2022. (athom, )
March 16, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (tgall, )
March 16, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Norvell Webster Crump. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tgall, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crump v. No Named Respondent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Norvell Webster Crump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: No Named Defendant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: No Named Respondent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?