Lozano Perez v. Garcia Mora
Petitioner: Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez
Respondent: Julieth Del Carmen Garcia Mora
Case Number: 1:2022cv00719
Filed: March 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Referring Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
2 Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Intl Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA)
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re #22 Response to Request for Extension of Time and Motion for Entry of Preliminary Injunction. In his #22 Response to Respondent's #21 Motion for Extension of Time or Continuance, Petitioner purports to "move[] this Court for the entry of a preliminary injunction directed to Respondent," specifically "[t]hat Respondent be enjoined from removing the minor child from this jurisdiction pending resolution on the merits in this matter;" and "[t]hat Respondent be required to immediately deposit into the custody of the Clerk of Court, her passport and the passport of [the minor child]." ECF No. 22, para. 11. However, under the District of Colorado's Local Rules of Practice, "[a] motion shall not be included in a response or reply to the original motion. A motion shall be filed as a separate document." D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d); see also RMR Practice Standard IV.B.1. ("All requests for the Court to take any action, make any type of ruling, or provide any type of relief must be contained in separate, written motions."). Therefore, if the Petitioner seeks preliminary injunctive relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, Petitioner must file a motion in accordance with that Rule, the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, and this Court's Practice Standards. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 5/16/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER granting #21 Motion for Extension of Time or Continuance. The Court liberally construes Respondents #21 motion as a motion for an extension of 30 days to answer or respond to the #1 Petition for Return of Child. See, e.g., Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 52021 (1972)). The Court GRANTS this request, and the Respondent SHALL RESPOND to the #1 Petition by 6/13/2022. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(C). SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 5/11/2022.(angar, )
May 11, 2022 Filing 22 RESPONSE to #21 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond filed by Petitioner Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez. (Harris, Richard)
May 5, 2022 Filing 21 MOTION for Extension of Time or Continuance by Respondent Julieth Del Carmen Garcia Mora. (athom, )
April 22, 2022 Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez. Julieth Del Carmen Garcia Mora served on 4/21/2022, answer due 5/12/2022. (Harris, Richard)
April 18, 2022 Filing 19 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Petitioner Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez All parties consent.. (Harris, Richard)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 4/13/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
April 13, 2022 Filing 17 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (athom, )
April 13, 2022 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-00719-RMR-NYW. (athom, )
April 12, 2022 Filing 15 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (trvo, )
April 12, 2022 Filing 14 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #13 Minute Order. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-00719-REB. (Text Only Entry). (alave, )
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/12/2022. IT IS ORDERED: The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to REDRAW this action to a District Judge for further proceedings. (alave, )
April 11, 2022 Filing 12 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (trvo, )
April 11, 2022 Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED. Pursuant to the Order Drawing Case filed at ECF No. #10 , this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-00719-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (trvo, )
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DRAWING CASE. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(a), the court has determined that this case does not appear appropriate for summary dismissal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/11/2022. (trvo, )
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #8 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) (ECF No. #2 ) and Proposed Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) are DENIED as moot. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/5/2022.(trvo, )
April 4, 2022 Filing 8 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Petitioner Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez. (Harris, Richard)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this Order must be labeled with the civil action number identified on this Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/28/2022. (trvo, )
March 23, 2022 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
March 23, 2022 Filing 5 Proposed Summons against Julieth Del Carmen Garcia More, filed by Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez.(Harris, Richard) Modified on 3/23/2022 to correct docket text(norlin, ).
March 23, 2022 Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet against Julieth Del Carmen Garcia More, filed by Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez.(Harris, Richard) Modified on 3/23/2022 to correct docket text(norlin, ).
March 23, 2022 Filing 3 Proposed Order to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Petitioner Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez. (Harris, Richard) Modified on 3/23/2022 to correct docket text to reflect the contents of the document.(norlin, ).
March 23, 2022 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Petitioner Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez. (Harris, Richard)
March 23, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR RETURN OF CHILD Attorney Richard A. Harris added to party Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez(pty:pet), filed by Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Harris, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lozano Perez v. Garcia Mora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jaime Enrique Lozano Perez
Represented By: Richard A. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Julieth Del Carmen Garcia Mora
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?