Carson v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Daniel E. Carson
Defendant: Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00919
Filed: April 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: S Kato Crews
Referring Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. The Court will GRANT the stipulated Motion. Accordingly, Defendants have until 6-14-2022 to answer or otherwise respond. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 5-19-2022. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 5/12/2022. Text Only Entry (dddlc4)
May 12, 2022 Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Osteon Holdings for Exactech, Inc.. (Crisham, John)
May 12, 2022 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Exactech, Inc. for Exactech U.S., Inc.. (Crisham, John)
May 12, 2022 Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Exactech U.S., Inc., Exactech, Inc.. (Crisham, John)
May 12, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of John K. Crisham by John K. Crisham on behalf of Exactech U.S., Inc., Exactech, Inc.Attorney John K. Crisham added to party Exactech U.S., Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney John K. Crisham added to party Exactech, Inc.(pty:dft) (Crisham, John)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 8-2-2022 at 9:30 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, 7 days before the Telephonic Scheduling Conference (on or before 7-26-2022). The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#3-2] is due 7-26-2022. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 5-5-2022. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
May 4, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel E. Carson. Exactech, Inc. served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (McLaughlin, George)
May 4, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel E. Carson. Exactech U.S., Inc. served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (McLaughlin, George)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 4/19/2022. Text Only Entry (dddlc4)
April 18, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (sapod, )
April 15, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (sapod, )
April 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Exactech U.S., Inc., Exactech, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8412210)Attorney George E. McLaughlin added to party Daniel E. Carson(pty:pla), filed by Daniel E. Carson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Exactech, Inc., #3 Summons Exactech U.S., Inc.)(McLaughlin, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carson v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel E. Carson
Represented By: George E. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech, Inc.
Represented By: John K. Crisham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech U.S., Inc.
Represented By: John K. Crisham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?