R2 Medical Clinic, P.C. v. Lann et al
| R2 Medical Clinic, P.C. |
| Daniel Lann, Denver Stretch Institute, Inc. a Colorado Corporation doing business as Denver Sports Recovery, Katie McConnell, David Raday, Jr. and Optimization Clinics, LLC |
| 1:2022cv01000 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. Summons submitted has incorrect caption and not issued. Please file completed summons for issuance using the event "Summons Request." (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary and Injunctive Relief by Plaintiff R2 Medical Clinic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Campbell, Stacey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Denver Stretch Institute, Inc. d/b/a Denver Sports Recovery, Daniel Lann, MD, Katie McConnell, Optimization Clinics, LLC, David Raday, Jr. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8425888)Attorney Stacey A. Campbell added to party R2 Medical Clinic, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by R2 Medical Clinic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Campbell, Stacey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
