Your Front Door, Inc. v. Vesync Co., Ltd. et al
| Your Front Door, Inc. |
| Vesync Co., Ltd., Cosori Corporation and Arovast Corporation |
| 1:2022cv01033 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #7 Amended Complaint by Defendants Arovast Corporation, Cosori Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) [PROPOSED] ORDER ON UNOPPOSED [STIPULATED] MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Brown, William) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint (First Amended Complaint [Doc 7]) by Defendants Arovast Corporation, Cosori Corporation. Arovast Corporation answer due 7/5/2022; Cosori Corporation answer due 7/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) ORDER ON STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Brown, William) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Vesync Co., Ltd., Corporate Parent Etekcity Corporation for Arovast Corporation; Corporate Parent Vesync Co., Ltd. for Cosori Corporation. (Brown, William) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint (First Amended Complaint [Doc 7]) by Defendants Arovast Corporation, Cosori Corporation. Arovast Corporation answer due 6/14/2022; Cosori Corporation answer due 6/14/2022. (Brown, William) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Your Front Door, Inc.. Arovast Corporation served on 5/4/2022, answer due 5/25/2022. (Rosenberg, Mark) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Your Front Door, Inc.. Cosori Corporation served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (Rosenberg, Mark) |
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 5/4/2022. Text Only Entry (dddlc2, )
|
|
Filing 10
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4 May 2022. In light of this case's reassignment (ECF 9 ), the scheduling conference set before this Court on July 7, 2022 and all associated deadlines (ECF #6 ) are vacated. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Daniel D. Domenico and kept to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01033-DDD-SKC. (Text only entry) . (tgall, ) Modified on 5/2/2022 add a docket number (agarc, ). |
| Filing 8 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01033-REB-SKC. (Text only entry) (tgall, ) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Arovast Corporation, Cosori Corporation, Vesync Co., Ltd. Attorney Mark Jon Rosenberg added to party Your Front Door, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Your Front Door, Inc..(Rosenberg, Mark) |
|
Filing 6
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 29 April 2022. Consent Form due by 6/24/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/30/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 7/7/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 5 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE re #1 Complaint, Report on the Filing an Action Regarding Trademark by Plaintiff Your Front Door, Inc. (Hudak, Sandra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arovast Corporation, Cosori Corporation, Vesync Co., Ltd. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8431642)Attorney Sandra A. Hudak added to party Your Front Door, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Your Front Door, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Vesync Co., Ltd., #3 Summons Cosori Corporation, #4 Summons Arovast Corporation)(Hudak, Sandra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
