Pickersgill v. Egotist, LLC, The
| Eric Pickersgill |
| The Egotist, LLC The Egotist, LLC dba The Denver Egotist doing business as The Denver Egotist and Egotist, LLC, The doing business as Denver Egotist, The |
| 1:2022cv01037 |
| April 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT against Egotist, LLC, The, filed by Eric Pickersgill. (Filed pursuant to ECF #17 ) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(cmadr, ) |
Filing 17
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 13 June 2022. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend (Dkt. #14 ) is GRANTED. The First Amended Complaint for Copyright Infringement and the accompanying exhibits (Dkt. #15-1 through 15-5) shall be filed on the docket as the operative pleading in this case. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #14 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint,, filed by Eric Pickersgill. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/13/2022. Text Only Entry (cmasec) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE re #1 Complaint,, of Amended Pleading by Plaintiff Eric Pickersgill (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1 - Works, #3 Exhibit 2 - Registrations, #4 Exhibit 3 - Infringement, #5 Exhibit 4 - Demand Letters)(Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Eric Pickersgill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Grossbardt, Jonah) |
|
Filing 13
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 25 May 2022. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Unopposed Motion to File Answer or Otherwise Respond and Continue Scheduling Conference and Associated Dates (Dkt #11 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) on or before June 15, 2022. The Scheduling Conference remains set for July 21, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM regarding #11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,, #8 Order, and Continue Scheduling Conference and Associated Dates filed by Egotist, LLC, The. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/25/2022. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,, #8 Order, and Continue Scheduling Conference and Associated Dates by Defendant Egotist, LLC, The. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Juo, James) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eric Pickersgill. Egotist, LLC, The served on 5/4/2022, answer due 5/25/2022. (Rollin, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Eric Pickersgill All parties do not consent.. (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 2 May 2022.Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/14/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 7/21/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Magistrate Judge Neureiter is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b). Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. The Magistrate Judge, at his/her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/2/2022. Text Only Entry (cmasec)
|
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/2/2022. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01037-CMA. (trvo, ) |
| Filing 5 Report re Copyright: Report on the filing of an action emailed separately to the Director of the Copyright Office. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Rollin, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement - Injunctive Relief Demanded against The Egotist, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8432716)Attorney Matthew Laurence Rollin added to party Eric Pickersgill(pty:pla), filed by Eric Pickersgill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Works, #2 Exhibit 2 - Registration, #3 Exhibit 3 - Infringement, #4 Exhibit 4 - Demand Letters, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright, #7 Summons)(Rollin, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
