Jones v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC
Emilee Jones |
Verizon Wireless Services, LLC |
1:2022cv01043 |
April 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Kristen L Mix |
Regina M Rodriguez |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 PRE-SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 06/24/2022. (alave, ) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas E.M. Werge on behalf of Verizon Wireless Services, LLCAttorney Thomas E.M. Werge added to party Verizon Wireless Services, LLC(pty:dft) (Werge, Thomas) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Verizon Wireless Services, LLC.(Singer, Elliot) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 05/18/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/21/2022. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 7/28/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document) (alave, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. For good cause shown, Defendant is GRANTED a 30-day extension, to and including 6/6/2022, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's #3 Complaint. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 5/9/2022. Text Only Entry(rmrja) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Singer, Elliot) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 4/29/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Emilee Jones. (Osborne, Matthew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew Ross Osborne on behalf of Emilee JonesAttorney Matthew Ross Osborne added to party Emilee Jones(pty:pla) (Osborne, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jtorr, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, filed by Emilee Jones.(jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Verizon Wireless, LLC (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8433777), filed by Verizon Wireless, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Summons, #3 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit State Court Docket, #6 Exhibit State Court Delay Reduction Order)(Singer, Elliot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emilee Jones | |
Represented By: | Matthew Ross Osborne |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Verizon Wireless Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | Elliot A. Singer |
Represented By: | Elliot Asher Singer |
Represented By: | Thomas E.M. Werge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.