Estate of Tyler Kracht v. City of Sterling, Colorado et al
Plaintiff: Estate of Tyler Kracht
Defendant: City of Sterling, Colorado, Austin Molcyk and Austin (I) Molcyk
Case Number: 1:2022cv01081
Filed: May 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2022 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Estate of Tyler Kracht. Austin Molcyk waiver sent on 6/6/2022, answer due 8/5/2022; Austin (I) Molcyk waiver sent on 6/6/2022, answer due 8/5/2022. (Allison, Reid)
June 22, 2022 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Estate of Tyler Kracht. City of Sterling, Colorado waiver sent on 5/25/2022, answer due 7/24/2022. (McNulty, Andrew)
June 21, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Tiffany Ellen Toomey on behalf of City of Sterling, ColoradoAttorney Tiffany Ellen Toomey added to party City of Sterling, Colorado(pty:dft) (Toomey, Tiffany)
June 21, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Eric Michael Ziporin on behalf of City of Sterling, ColoradoAttorney Eric Michael Ziporin added to party City of Sterling, Colorado(pty:dft) (Ziporin, Eric)
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 5 May 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/7/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2022 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
May 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 5/4/2022. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
May 4, 2022 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/4/2022. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01081-DDD. (trvo, )
May 2, 2022 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). NO SUMMONS ISSUED. (jcharl, )
May 2, 2022 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, )
May 2, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew Joseph McNulty on behalf of Estate of Tyler KrachtAttorney Andrew Joseph McNulty added to party Estate of Tyler Kracht(pty:pla) (McNulty, Andrew)
May 2, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Reid Robertson Allison on behalf of Estate of Tyler KrachtAttorney Reid Robertson Allison added to party Estate of Tyler Kracht(pty:pla) (Allison, Reid)
May 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against City of Sterling, Colorado, Austin Molcyk (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8437690)Attorney Mari Anne Newman added to party Estate of Tyler Kracht(pty:pla), filed by Estate of Tyler Kracht. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Newman, Mari)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estate of Tyler Kracht v. City of Sterling, Colorado et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estate of Tyler Kracht
Represented By: Andrew Joseph McNulty
Represented By: Reid Robertson Allison
Represented By: Mari Anne Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sterling, Colorado
Represented By: Tiffany Ellen Toomey
Represented By: Eric Michael Ziporin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Austin Molcyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Austin (I) Molcyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?