Decker v. Arrowhead Propane, Inc.
William Decker |
Arrowhead Propane, Inc. |
1:2022cv01135 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
N Reid Neureiter |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Review by Plaintiff William Decker. (Hemmat, Chad) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Arrowhead Propane, Inc..(Woods, Jacob) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Steven M. Hamilton on behalf of Arrowhead Propane, Inc. Attorney Steven M. Hamilton added to party Arrowhead Propane, Inc. (pty:dft) (Hamilton, Steven) |
Filing 8 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 3 June 2022. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #7 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) on or before June 17, 2022. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Arrowhead Propane, Inc.. (Woods, Jacob) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Decker. Arrowhead Propane, Inc. served on 5/13/2022, answer due 6/3/2022. (Hemmat, Chad) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 6 May 2022. Consent Form due by 7/27/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/3/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Arrowhead Propane re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff William Decker. (Hemmat, Chad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against William Decker (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8445614)Attorney Chad Patrick Hemmat added to party William Decker (pty:pla), filed by William Decker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hemmat, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Decker v. Arrowhead Propane, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William Decker | |
Represented By: | Chad Patrick Hemmat |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Arrowhead Propane, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jacob Russell Woods |
Represented By: | Steven M. Hamilton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.