Knipp v. Whiting Petroleum Corporation et al
| Kevin Knipp |
| Whiting Petroleum Corporation, Kevin S. McCarthy, Janet L. Carrig, Susan M. Cunningham, Paul J. Korus, Lynn A. Peterson, Daniel J. Rice and Anne Taylor |
| 1:2022cv01149 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Setting Telephonic Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference. The Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 8-22-2022 at 10:00 am in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. The parties shall file their proposed scheduling order, and email a copy in Word format to Crews_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, 7 days before the Telephonic Scheduling Conference (on or before 8-15-2022). The Magistrate Judge Consent Form [#6-1] is due 8-15-2022. Dial in information for the Scheduling Conference is as follows:CONFERENCE CALL LINE: (888) 251-2909ACCESS CODE: 5662814# SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 5-19-2022. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kevin Knipp. Janet L. Carrig waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022; Susan M. Cunningham waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022; Paul J. Korus waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022; Kevin S. McCarthy waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022; Lynn A. Peterson waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022; Daniel J. Rice waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022; Anne Taylor waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022; Whiting Petroleum Corporation waiver sent on 5/11/2022, answer due 7/10/2022. (Ackerman, Marc) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 4 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES re: #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by attorney Marc Ackerman. Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents. ADDITIONALLY, The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Ackerman, Marc) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to WHITING PETROLEUM CORPORATION, KEVIN S. MCCARTHY, JANET L. CARRIG, SUSAN M. CUNNINGHAM, PAUL J. KORUS, LYNN A. PETERSON, DANIEL J. RICE, and ANNE TAYLOR by Plaintiff Kevin Knipp. (Ackerman, Marc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Janet L. Carrig, Susan M. Cunningham, Paul J. Korus, Kevin S. McCarthy, Lynn A. Peterson, Daniel J. Rice, Anne Taylor, Whiting Petroleum Corporation (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8448819)Attorney Marc L. Ackerman added to party Kevin Knipp(pty:pla), filed by Kevin Knipp. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ackerman, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
