Ward v. City of Aurora, Colorado
| Charles Ward |
| City of Aurora, Colorado, Andrew Brown and Randy Roedema |
| 1:2022cv01150 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| William J Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #19 Order. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01150-WJM. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 19
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5 July 2022. Pursuant to the form declining consent under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(c) at ECF #16 , the Court directs the Clerk of Court to reassign this case under D.C. Colo. LCivR 40.1(a). This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D.C. Colo. LCivR 72.1(c). (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 18
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5 July 2022. For good cause shown, the parties' Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference #17 is granted. Pursuant to the parties' agreement, Plaintiff shall file his Amended Complaint by July 15, 2022, and Defendants shall file their answer or other response to the Amended Complaint by August 5, 2022. The Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference currently set for July 11, 2022 is reset to September 26, 2022 at 10:45 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 17 Joint MOTION to Vacate Scheduling Conference by Defendant Randy Roedema. (Abramson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Randy Roedema All parties do not consent.. (Abramson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael Turner Lowe on behalf of Andrew BrownAttorney Michael Turner Lowe added to party Andrew Brown(pty:dft) (Lowe, Michael) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Gillian Marie Fahlsing on behalf of Andrew Brown, City of Aurora, Colorado, Randy RoedemaAttorney Gillian Marie Fahlsing added to party Andrew Brown(pty:dft), Attorney Gillian Marie Fahlsing added to party City of Aurora, Colorado(pty:dft), Attorney Gillian Marie Fahlsing added to party Randy Roedema(pty:dft) (Fahlsing, Gillian) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Yulia Nikolaevskaya on behalf of Randy RoedemaAttorney Yulia Nikolaevskaya added to party Randy Roedema(pty:dft) (Nikolaevskaya, Yulia) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jonathan Marshall Abramson on behalf of Randy RoedemaAttorney Jonathan Marshall Abramson added to party Randy Roedema(pty:dft) (Abramson, Jonathan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Peter Ruben Morales on behalf of Andrew Brown, City of Aurora, Colorado, Randy RoedemaAttorney Peter Ruben Morales added to party Andrew Brown(pty:dft), Attorney Peter Ruben Morales added to party City of Aurora, Colorado(pty:dft), Attorney Peter Ruben Morales added to party Randy Roedema(pty:dft) (Morales, Peter) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER terminating #8 Motion for Leave as a pending motion in this case for administrative purposes. It appears that this motion was filed in this case in error. The motion also was filed in the correct case number where it was granted. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 06/06/2022. Text Only Entry(mehlc1, )
|
| Filing 9 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #7 Waiver of Service Executed filed by attorney Igor Raykin. Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to PARTICIPATE BY PHONE AND FOR CLARIFICATION OF PLAINTIFFS PARTICIPATION IN THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE by Plaintiff Charles Ward. (Raykin, Igor) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Charles Ward. All Defendants. (Raykin, Igor) |
|
Filing 6
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1 June 2022. Consent Form due by 7/1/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/4/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 7/11/2022 11:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David M. Goddard on behalf of Andrew BrownAttorney David M. Goddard added to party Andrew Brown(pty:dft) (Goddard, David) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Submitted, No Summons Issued. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Charles Ward (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8450316)Attorney Igor Raykin added to party Charles Ward(pty:pla), filed by Charles Ward.(Raykin, Igor) |
| Filing 1 Administrative Notice: No initiating document. Attorney contacted with instructions to file the initiating document within 24 hours. (Text Only Entry) (tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
