Hargrave v. Lovett
Petitioner: Deontae J. Hargrave
Respondent: S. Lovett
Case Number: 1:2022cv01277
Filed: May 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: S Kato Crews
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
2 Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 7/21/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
July 21, 2022 Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Service by mail by Clerk of Court re #16 Response to Order to Show Cause, and 18 Minute Order, to Deontae J. Hargrave #85498-083 HAZELTON-USP U.S. PENITENTIARY Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 2000 BRUCETON MILLS, WV 26525. Text Only Entry. (cmadr, )
July 21, 2022 Filing 19 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #17 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01277-RMR. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, )
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER RE: Deadline for Petitioner to Reply. The Court previously denied Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to respond. But given Magistrate Judge Gallagher's show cause order [#10] permitting his reply, the Court will permit Petitioner to reply. Accordingly, Petitioner has until 8-5-2022 to file his reply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is instructed to send a copy of Respondent's response. [#16.] SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 7-20-2022. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
July 18, 2022 Filing 17 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondent S. Lovett All parties do not consent.. (Prochazka, Julia)
July 13, 2022 Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #10 by Respondent S. Lovett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Carroll Decl., #2 Exhibit 1-1 - Carroll Decl. Att. 1, #3 Exhibit 1-2 - Carroll Decl. Att. 2, #4 Exhibit 1-3 - Carroll Decl. Att. 3, #5 Exhibit 1-4 - Carroll Decl. Att. 4, #6 Exhibit 1-5 - Carroll Decl. Att. 5, #7 Exhibit 1-6 - Carroll Decl. Att. 6, #8 Exhibit 1-7 - Carroll Decl. Att. 7, #9 Exhibit 1-8 - Carroll Decl. Att. 8, #10 Exhibit 1-9 - Carroll Decl. Att. 9)(Prochazka, Julia)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER denying #14 Motion for Order. Petitioner seeks an extension of time to respond to Respondent's reply. However, Judge Gallagher's Show Cause Order [#10] is returnable by the Respondent, here S. Lovette. Because there is no need for Petitioner to reply, the Motion is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 7-11-2022. Text Only Entry (skclc2).
June 21, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION for Enlargement of Time by Petitioner Deontae J. Hargrave. (csarr, )
June 21, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Change of Address by Petitioner Deontae J. Hargrave (csarr, )
June 13, 2022 Filing 12 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, )
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DRAWING CASE by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 06/13/2022. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01277-SKC. (athom, )
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is ORDERED that Respondent show cause within thirty (30) days from the date of this order why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Within thirty (30) days of Respondent's answer to this show cause order Applicant may file a Reply, if any. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 06/13/2022. (athom, )
June 10, 2022 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #3 Order,, Preliminary Response by Respondent S. Lovett. (Prochazka, Julia)
June 10, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Julia M. Prochazka on behalf of S. LovettAttorney Julia M. Prochazka added to party S. Lovett(pty:res) (Prochazka, Julia)
June 6, 2022 Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt for Service upon United States Attorney General on 05/31/2022 re #4 Certificate of Service. (athom, )
May 24, 2022 Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE by U.S. Attorney's Office of the #3 Order to File Preliminary Response and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (athom, )
May 24, 2022 Filing 5 Acknowledgment RECEIPT on behalf of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado re: #4 Certificate of Service. (athom, )
May 24, 2022 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Order to File Preliminary Response for Service of Process (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipt) (athom, )
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE. Within twenty-one days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order. Within twenty-one days of the filing of the Preliminary Response Petitioner may file a Reply if he desires. If Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative defense of exhaustion of administrative remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the Preliminary Response. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 05/23/2022. (athom, )
May 23, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
May 23, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number COX103281), filed by Deontae J. Hargrave. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(jtorr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hargrave v. Lovett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Deontae J. Hargrave
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: S. Lovett
Represented By: Julia M. Prochazka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?