Stoole v. Bret's Electric, LLC et al
Michael Stoole |
Bret's Electric, LLC, Bret Martin and Janet Martin |
1:2022cv01513 |
June 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Lewis T Babcock |
N Reid Neureiter |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Bret's Electric, LLC, Bret Martin, Janet Martin.(Dunkin, Andrew) |
Filing 13 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #12 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer/Respond to Complaint filed by attorneys Mary Elizabeth Melso & Penn Anderson Dodson. The s/signature did not match the filers name on the account for which the login and password are registered. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(c) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendants Janet Martin, Bret Martin, Bret's Electric, LLC. All Defendants. (Dunkin, Andrew) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Andrew Dunkin by Andrew Nathan Dunkin on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Andrew Nathan Dunkin added to party Bret's Electric, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Nathan Dunkin added to party Bret Martin(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew Nathan Dunkin added to party Janet Martin(pty:dft) (Dunkin, Andrew) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Stoole. Bret's Electric, LLC served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022. (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 17 June 2022. Consent Form due by 9/28/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/7/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 10/12/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (angar, ) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE, by Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. This case is randomly returned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-1513-NRN (angar, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Janet Martin by Plaintiff Michael Stoole. (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Bret Martin by Plaintiff Michael Stoole. (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Bret's Electric, LLC by Plaintiff Michael Stoole. (Dodson, Penn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Stoole (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8511087)Attorney Penn Anderson Dodson added to party Michael Stoole(pty:pla), filed by Michael Stoole. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Dodson, Penn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.