Calton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Taylor Calton |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 1:2022cv01637 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 22 August 2022. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 17 COURTROOM MINUTES for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 8/22/2022.FTR: A501. (cthom, ) |
| Filing 16 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Queenan, Gordon) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #14 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/10/2022. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company All parties consent.. (Queenan, Gordon) |
|
Filing 13
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 20 July 2022. Before the Court is Defendant's Response to Order to Show Cause. ECF #12 . In light of the information provided by Defendant, this Courts Order (ECF #11 ) is discharged. Consent Form due by 8/9/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/15/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 8/22/2022 01:15 PM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #11 by Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - LinkedIn Profile, #2 Exhibit B - Voter registration - Katherine, #3 Exhibit C - Voter registration - Brady, #4 Exhibit D - LinkedIn Kathy, #5 Exhibit E - LinkedIn Brady, #6 Exhibit F - EVHS Awards, #7 Exhibit G - Med record)(Queenan, Gordon) |
|
Filing 11
DISCHARGED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5 July 2022. It isORDERED that Defendant file a written response to this Order to Show Cause on or before July 19, 2022, demonstrating why the Court should not remand this case (or recommend that it be remanded) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (cmadr, ) Modified pursuant to ECF #13 on 7/20/2022 (cmadr, ).
|
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 9 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's ANSWER and Jury Demand to #6 Complaint and Jury Demand by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.(jtorr, ) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of Summons, Complaint and Jury Demand, and District Court Civil Case Cover Sheet upon State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company on 06/01/2022. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, filed by Taylor Calton.(jtorr, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Ethan A. McQuinn by Ethan Andrew McQuinn on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Ethan Andrew McQuinn added to party Taylor Calton(pty:pla) (McQuinn, Ethan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Gordon A. Queenan by Gordon Alec Queenan on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAttorney Gordon Alec Queenan added to party State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Queenan, Gordon) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Franklin D. Patterson by Franklin D. Patterson on behalf of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Patterson, Franklin) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Patterson, Franklin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Denver District Court, Case Number 2022CV031508. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8534791), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Summons, #4 Exhibit D - ROS, #5 Exhibit E - Answer, #6 Exhibit F - SOS Summary, #7 Exhibit G - DRO, #8 Exhibit H - PTO, #9 Exhibit I - Notice to Set, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Patterson, Franklin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Calton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Taylor Calton | |
| Represented By: | Ethan Andrew McQuinn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Gordon Alec Queenan |
| Represented By: | Franklin D. Patterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
