Richards v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
Daniel P. Richards |
Lockheed Martin Corporation a corporation headquartered in and organized under the laws of the State of Maryland doing business as Lockheed Martin Space |
1:2022cv01640 |
July 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
Regina M Rodriguez |
Charlotte N Sweeney |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: The Status Conference, which shall be held TELEPHONICALLY, is RESET for September 20, 2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. At the appointed time, each participant should call 571-353-2301, and then enter ID # 617286044. The court expects parties to utilize land line telephones rather than cellular devices whenever possible. If a party must utilize a cellular telephone, the caller must be in an indoor stationary position. A copy of this Minute Order shall be sent to Plaintiff at his address of record: Daniel P. Richards, 3 Olive Drive, Apt 2, Cathlamet, WA 98612. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 08/03/22. Text Only Entry (mdblc2) |
Filing 8 REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Due to the recent appointment of Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang as a United States District Judge, this action is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should reference Magistrate Judge Dominguez Braswell at the end of the civil action number (22-cv-01640-CNS-MDB). Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Magistrate Judge Dominguez Braswell. (Text only entry) (agarc, ) |
Filing 7 REASSIGNMENT OF JUDGE. This action is reassigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney upon her appointment. Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Judge Sweeney in Courtroom 204 in the Byron Rogers Courthouse. Her chambers are located in C-253 and her telephone number is (303) 335-2610. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-01640-CNS-NYW. (Text only entry) (trvo, ) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service by Mail by Clerk of Court re #5 Minute Order, to Daniel P. Richards, 3 Olive Drive, Apt 2, Cathlamet, WA 98612. Text Only Entry. (alave, ) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 07/14/2022. IT IS ORDERED that a Status Conference is set for September 14, 2022, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom A-502, 5th Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Minute Order shall be sent to: Daniel P. Richards, 3 Olive Drive, Apt 2, Cathlamet, WA 98612. (alave, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 7/5/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. modified to correct text on 7/1/2022 (tgall, ). |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lockheed Martin Corporation (Filing Fee: $402.00 Receipt Number:COX103725), filed by Daniel P. Richards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richards v. Lockheed Martin Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel P. Richards | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation a corporation headquartered in and organized under the laws of the State of Maryland doing business as Lockheed Martin Space | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.