Howland v. Denver Downtown Detention Center et al
| Joseph Howland |
| Denver Downtown Detention Center, James and Michell |
| 1:2022cv01779 |
| July 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 09/13/2022. After initiating this action on July 18, 2022 (ECF No. #1 ), Plaintiff was directed on July 20, 2022, to cure filing deficiencies by submitting a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #3 ). He has thus far failed to do so. In a minute order entered on August 10, 2022 (ECF No. #6 ), the Court again directed Plaintiff to submit to the Court, within 30 days, a fully completed Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Clerk of the Court mailed a copy of the court-approved form and applicable instructions to Plaintiff. On September 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 (ECF No. #8 ), which is not on the correct form for this civil rights action. Plaintiff is instructed that he must complete and submit all pages of the form on or before October 13, 2022, or this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. (sapod, )
|
| Filing 8 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Joseph Howland. (sapod, ) |
| Filing 7 SECOND MOTION Requesting Deficiencies by Plaintiff Joseph Howland. (sapod, ) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER granting #5 Motion Requesting List of Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 08/10/2022. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this Minute Order to cure the deficiencies as directed in the Court's July 20, 2022 Order. Plaintiff is required to submit a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 on the Court-approved form along with the required documentation i.e. signed authorization page and certified copy of inmate account statement. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without further notice. No further extensions of time will be granted without just cause.(sapod, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION Requesting a list of deficiencies by Plaintiff Joseph Howland. (sapod, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION Requesting to Proceed Indigent by Plaintiff Joseph Howland. (sapod, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Applicant To Cure Deficiencies. It is ORDERED that Mr. Howland cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Mr. Howland fails to cure all designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 7/20/2022. (sapod, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Denver Downtown Detention Center, James, Michell, filed by Joseph Howland. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jcharl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
