Kirkwood v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest et al
John Kirkwood |
Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
1:2022cv01801 |
July 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Regina M Rodriguez |
Scott T Varholak |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8/24/2022. (morti, ) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8/24/2022. Discovery due by 3/24/2023. FTR: A402. (morti, ) |
Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order (filed on behalf of all parties) by Defendants Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. (Brooks, Lawrence) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Russell Burkhart Connelly on behalf of John KirkwoodAttorney Russell Burkhart Connelly added to party John Kirkwood(pty:pla) (Connelly, Russell) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Christopher Kevin Gilbert on behalf of John KirkwoodAttorney Christopher Kevin Gilbert added to party John Kirkwood(pty:pla) (Gilbert, Christopher) |
Filing 9 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference. A Scheduling Conference is set for 8/24/2022 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Proposed Scheduling Order due 8/17/2022. By Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on July 22, 2022. (rvill, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 7/21/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (norlin, ) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to First #4 Amended Complaint and Jury Demand by Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc..(norlin, ) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages against Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., filed by John Kirkwood.(norlin, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT for Damages against Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., filed by John Kirkwood.(norlin, ) |
Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest from Larimer County District Court, Case Number 2022CV30288. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8565347), filed by The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C to Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D to Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E to Notice of Removal, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F to Notice of Removal, #9 Exhibit Exhibit G to Notice of Removal, #10 Exhibit Exhibit H to Notice of Removal, #11 Exhibit Exhibit I to Notice of Removal, #12 Exhibit Exhibit J to Notice of Removal, #13 Exhibit Exhibit K to Notice of Removal, #14 Exhibit Exhibit L to Notice of Removal, #15 Exhibit Exhibit M to Notice of Removal, #16 Exhibit Exhibit N to Notice of Removal, #17 Exhibit Exhibit O to Notice of Removal, #18 Exhibit Exhibit P to Notice of Removal, #19 Continuation of Main Document Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Brooks, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.