Wolfe v. Calhoun
| Colton Wolfe |
| Daniel Calhoun, Daniel (I) Calhoun, Allen Cooper, Allen (I) Cooper, Daniel Victoria, Daniel (I) Victoria, Kaitlin B Turner, Kaitlin (I) B Turner, Aaron Pembleton, Aaron (I) Pembleton, Sunny Bryant, Sunny (I) Bryant, Debbie Bell, Debbie (I) Bell, Dwayne MC Fall, Dwayne (I) MC Fall, Kevin Grantham, Kevin (I) Grantham, Freemont County and US Bank |
| 1:2022cv01935 |
| August 4, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MOTION for Leave to #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit exhibit 2)(Wolfe, Colton) |
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER: The #18 #17 Exhibits are STRICKEN. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks to amend and/or supplement his complaint, he must file a motion or notice and attach a copy of the proposed amended pleading. D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(c), a pro se litigant "shall use the procedures, forms, and instructions posted on the court's website." Further, a plaintiff may not incorporate by reference his original complaint into a proposed amended complaint. The proposed amended complaint must stand alone; it must contain all of the plaintiff's claims. See Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007) (stating that "an amended complaint supersedes an original complaint and renders the original complaint without legal effect"). SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 09/20/22. Text Only Entry (mdblc2)
|
| Filing 18 STRICKEN Exhibits in Support of #1 Complaint,, Exhibit 2 by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) Modified pursuant 19 on 9/20/2022 (csarr, ). |
| Filing 17 STRICKEN Exhibits in Support of #1 Complaint,, Exhibit 1 by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) Modified pursuant 19 on 9/20/2022 (csarr, ). |
| Filing 16 SUMMONSES issued by Clerk on 8/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons) (angar, ) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS REQUEST as to US Bank re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Sunny Bryant re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Kevin Grantham re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Kaitlin Brianne Turner re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Fremont County re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Dwayne McFall re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Debbie Bell re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Daniel Victoria re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Daniel Calhoun re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Allen Cooper re #1 Complaint,, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe. (Wolfe, Colton) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE, by Plaintiff Colton Wolfe (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(angar, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 8/4/2022. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Magistrate Consent For Mailed to Pro Se litigant via USPS. No Summons Issued (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Debbie Bell, Debbie (I) Bell, Sunny Bryant, Sunny (I) Bryant, Daniel Calhoun, Daniel (I) Calhoun, Allen Cooper, Allen (I) Cooper, Dwayne MC Fall, Dwayne (I) MC Fall, Freemont County, Kevin Grantham, Kevin (I) Grantham, Aaron Pembleton, Aaron (I) Pembleton, Kaitlin B Turner, Kaitlin (I) B Turner, US Bank, Daniel Victoria, Daniel (I) Victoria Filing Fee: $402.00Receipt Number:COX104036, filed by Colton Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(norlin, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
