California Innovations Inc. v. Ice Rover, Inc.
California Innovations Inc. |
Ice Rover, Inc. |
1:2022cv01986 |
August 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Raymond P Moore |
N Reid Neureiter |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 0101 (35:101 Patent Infringement) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Sawtelle, James) |
Filing 16 Ice Rover, Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against California Innovations Inc. by Ice Rover, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Sawtelle, James) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by James Gordon Sawtelle on behalf of Ice Rover, Inc.Attorney James Gordon Sawtelle added to party Ice Rover, Inc.(pty:dft) (Sawtelle, James) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Lee F. Johnston (Johnston, Lee) |
|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by California Innovations Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/30/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec ) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff California Innovations Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Granting Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Johnston, Lee) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by California Innovations Inc.. Ice Rover, Inc. served on 8/10/2022, answer due 8/31/2022. (Johnston, Lee) |
|
|
|
Filing 6 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (norlin, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE - Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff California Innovations Inc. (Johnston, Lee) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Johnston, Lee) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ice Rover, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8596686)Attorney Lee F. Johnston added to party California Innovations Inc.(pty:pla), filed by California Innovations Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons)(Johnston, Lee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: California Innovations Inc. v. Ice Rover, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: California Innovations Inc. | |
Represented By: | Lee F. Johnston |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ice Rover, Inc. | |
Represented By: | James Gordon Sawtelle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.