Acuity Mutual Insurance Company v. MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Acuity Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC, Frisco Hospitality, LLC, MM Properties, LLC and Broadstroke Design, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv02093
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Raymond P Moore
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2022 Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. Frisco Hospitality, LLC served on 9/28/2022, answer due 10/19/2022. (Kurpanek, Andrew)
October 10, 2022 Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. Broadstroke Design, Inc. served on 9/28/2022, answer due 10/19/2022. (Kurpanek, Andrew)
October 10, 2022 Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. MM Properties, LLC served on 10/4/2022, answer due 10/25/2022. (Kurpanek, Andrew)
October 3, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons by Plaintiff Acuity Mutual Insurance Company (Kurpanek, Andrew)
September 28, 2022 Filing 14 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (sdunb, )
September 27, 2022 Filing 13 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Broadstroke Design, Inc by Plaintiff Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Kurpanek, Andrew)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DISREGARD, FILED INTO INCORRECT CASE CIVIL CASE SCHEDULING ORDER IN AN ERISA ACTION by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8 September 2022. (cmadr, ) Modified on 9/9/2022 (cmadr, ).
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 8 September 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/8/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 11/15/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER The Court finds #9 Response to Order to Show Cause sufficient at this stage of the proceedings to satisfy the Court of its subject matter jurisdiction over this lawsuit. Accordingly, #7 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 9/7/2022. Text Only Entry (stvlc4, )
September 7, 2022 Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #7 by Plaintiff Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Kurpanek, Andrew)
August 18, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONSES issued by Clerk on 8/18/2022. (angar, )
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DISCHARGEDORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 17 August 2022. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, on or before September 7, 2022, Plaintiff shall show cause, if any there be, in writing, why this case should not be dismissed due to the Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (cmadr, ) Modified pursuant to ECF #9 on 9/9/2022 (cmadr, ).
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/17/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 8/17/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
August 17, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST as to MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC, Frisco Hospitality, LLC, MM Properties, LLC by Plaintiff Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC, #2 Summons MM Properties, LLC)(Kurpanek, Andrew)
August 16, 2022 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Summons submitted is incomplete and not issued. Please file completed summons for issuance using the event Summons Request. (jcharl, )
August 16, 2022 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, )
August 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against Broadstroke Design, Inc., Frisco Hospitality, LLC, MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC, MM Properties, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8609437)Attorney Andrew D. Kurpanek added to party Acuity Mutual Insurance Company(pty:pla), filed by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3-Part 1, #4 Exhibit 3-Part 2, #5 Summons MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC, #6 Summons Frisco Hospitality, LLC, #7 Summons MM Properties, LLC, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kurpanek, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acuity Mutual Insurance Company v. MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Acuity Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Andrew D. Kurpanek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MJ Masonry & Stucco, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frisco Hospitality, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MM Properties, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Broadstroke Design, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?