Mellaconic IP LLC v. ProCare Software, LLC
Mellaconic IP LLC |
ProCare Software, LLC |
1:2022cv02164 |
August 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Kristen L Mix |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 PRE-SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/17/2022. (alave, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 09/14/2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #10 is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the operative complaint is extended to November 15, 2022.(alave, ) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Mellaconic IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Curfman, Andrew) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 08/29/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/15/2022. Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 11/22/2022 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document) (alave, ) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mellaconic IP LLC. ProCare Software, LLC served on 8/26/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. (Curfman, Andrew) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4), the deadline to file the Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form [#5-1] is November 8, 2022. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/29/2022. Text Only Entry (klmlc2, ) |
Filing 6 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, ) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Curfman, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff Mellaconic IP LLC (Curfman, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ProCare Software, LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8620680)Attorney Andrew S. Curfman added to party Mellaconic IP LLC(pty:pla), filed by Mellaconic IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-US9986435, #2 Exhibit B-Claim Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Curfman, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mellaconic IP LLC v. ProCare Software, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mellaconic IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Andrew S. Curfman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ProCare Software, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.