Reiman v. J.E. Dunn Construction Company
| Allen Reiman |
| J.E. Dunn Construction Company |
| 1:2022cv02168 |
| August 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| Scott T Varholak |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/6/2022. The Stipulation and Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice #13 is approved; all claims are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney fees and costs; any deadlines are vacated; and this case is closed. (rebsec)
|
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss WITH PREJUDICE by Plaintiff Allen Reiman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Faust, Dean) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER re: #11 Notice of Entry of Appearance filed by J.E. Dunn Construction Company. The Scheduling Conference set 11/1/2022 before Magistrate Judge Varholak is vacated. Dismissal Paper due by 10/19/2022. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/19/2022. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance and Notice of Settlement by Scott Alan McGath on behalf of J.E. Dunn Construction CompanyAttorney Scott Alan McGath added to party J.E. Dunn Construction Company(pty:dft) (McGath, Scott) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Plaintiff Allen Reiman (Faust, Dean) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Allen Reiman. J.E. Dunn Construction Company served on 8/26/2022, answer due 9/16/2022. (Faust, Dean) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 26 August 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/25/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 11/1/2022 09:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a SchedulingOrder that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders asappropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, furtherthat the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of JudgeBlackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred,subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referredas defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. Onthe recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the partiesby motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, asettlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/25/2022. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 4 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES:re: #1 Complaint filed by attorney Dean J. Faust. Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry). Additionally, #1 Complaint filed by attorney The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (tgall, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS REQUEST as to J.E. Dunn Construction Company re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Allen Reiman. (Faust, Dean) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE re #1 Complaint Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Allen Reiman (Faust, Dean) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8620894)Attorney Dean J. Faust added to party Allen Reiman(pty:pla), filed by Allen Reiman.(Faust, Dean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reiman v. J.E. Dunn Construction Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Allen Reiman | |
| Represented By: | Dean J. Faust |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: J.E. Dunn Construction Company | |
| Represented By: | Scott Alan McGath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
