Tranquility IP LLC v. Netapp, Inc.
| Tranquility IP LLC |
| Netapp, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv02196 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 22 September 2022. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint (Dkt. #9 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) on or before November 14, 2022. The Scheduling Conference remains set for November 15, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, (Agreed) by Plaintiff Tranquility IP LLC. (Bennett, David) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 29 August 2022. Consent Form due by 11/1/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/8/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 11/15/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (888) 398-2342, Access Code 5755390# at the scheduled time. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION (Related Cases Involving the Same Patents Pending in Any Jurisdiction) by David R. Bennett on behalf of Tranquility IP LLC (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Report of the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff Tranquility IP LLC (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Netapp, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8627792)Attorney David R. Bennett added to party Tranquility IP LLC(pty:pla), filed by Tranquility IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 8,272,037, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Bennett, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tranquility IP LLC v. Netapp, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tranquility IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Netapp, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
