Maximus, Inc. v. NetApp, Inc.
Plaintiff: Maximus, Inc.
Defendant: NetApp, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv02255
Filed: August 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Referring Judge: Michael E Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 26 October 2022. For good cause shown, the parties' Joint Motion for Additional Time for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint so that the Parties may Continue to Confer Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Possible Amended Complaint #16 is granted. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before December 8, 2022.(cmadr, )
October 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #16 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint So That the Parties May Continue to Confer Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Possible Amended Complaint. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 10/25/2022. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
October 25, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE Regarding Filing of Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Maximus, Inc. (Elkins, Kevin)
October 18, 2022 Filing 17 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: Attorneys R. David Jacobs and Kevin Tyler Elkins: your 2022 Biennial / Renewal Fee payments were ENTERED IN ERROR in this civil case. The Instructions for Payment of the Attorney 2022 Biennial Renewal Fee available on the U.S. District Court website (http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/AttorneyInformation/BiennialRenewalFeeInformation.aspx) and the bullet point guidance on the Biennial Fee page itself indicate that the fee must be paid in the specially-designated miscellaneous case, 22-mc-6000. DO NOT TAKE ANY FURTHER ACTION. Instead, in order to maintain a correct public record of payments of the biennial fee by counsel, court staff must now manually transfer the payment record from this case to 22-mc-6000. IN THE FUTURE, counsel SHALL fully review instruction documents, and if unsure how to proceed, contact the Attorney Services Division of the court at: cod_attorneyservices@cod.uscourts.gov. Signed on this date, Edward Butler, Legal Officer, U.S. District Court. (Text Only Entry) (ebutl)
October 18, 2022 Filing 16 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint So That the Parties May Continue to Confer Regarding Motion to Dismiss and Possible Amended Complaint by Defendant NetApp, Inc.. (Kawanabe, Kenzo)
October 3, 2022 Filing 15 2022 Biennial fee payment for Kevin Tyler Elkins $60, receipt number ACODC-8693162.. (Elkins, Kevin)
October 3, 2022 Filing 14 2022 Biennial fee payment for R. David Jacobs $60, receipt number ACODC-8693031.. (Jacobs, R.)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 27 September 2022. For good cause shown, Defendant's Stipulated Extension for Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand #12 is granted. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before October 18, 2022. (cmadr, )
September 26, 2022 Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant NetApp, Inc.. NetApp, Inc. answer due 10/18/2022. (Kawanabe, Kenzo)
September 26, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Daniel Alexander Richards on behalf of NetApp, Inc.Attorney Daniel Alexander Richards added to party NetApp, Inc.(pty:dft) (Richards, Daniel)
September 26, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kenzo Sunao Kawanabe on behalf of NetApp, Inc.Attorney Kenzo Sunao Kawanabe added to party NetApp, Inc.(pty:dft) (Kawanabe, Kenzo)
September 22, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maximus, Inc.. NetApp, Inc. served on 9/6/2022, answer due 9/27/2022. (Jacobs, R.)
September 19, 2022 Filing 8 DISREGARD - FILED IN WRONG CASE Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time to File the Ordered Amended Complaint, by Plaintiff Maximus, Inc.. (angar, ) Modified on 9/20/2022 to show as filed in wrong case (angar, ).
September 2, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Kevin T. Elkins by Kevin Tyler Elkins on behalf of Maximus, Inc.Attorney Kevin Tyler Elkins added to party Maximus, Inc.(pty:pla) (Elkins, Kevin)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2 September 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/3/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 11/10/2022 01:45 PM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 9/1/2022. Text Only Entry. (rkeec)
September 1, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, )
August 31, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (tgall, )
August 31, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Jacobs, R.)
August 31, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NetApp, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8636064)Attorney R. David Jacobs added to party Maximus, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Maximus, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jacobs, R.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maximus, Inc. v. NetApp, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maximus, Inc.
Represented By: R. David Jacobs
Represented By: Kevin Tyler Elkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NetApp, Inc.
Represented By: Kenzo Sunao Kawanabe
Represented By: Daniel Alexander Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?