Fenninger et al v. Wilson
| Eugene Fenninger, IV and Eugene Fenninger, III |
| Christopher M. Wilson |
| 1:2022cv02292 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Robert W. Rock on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Rock, Robert) |
| Filing 15 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #10 Proposed Scheduling Order filed by attorney Deana R. Dagner.The s/signature did not match the filers name on the account for which the login and password are registered. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(c) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (athom, ) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Robert W. Rock on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Robert W. Rock added to party Eugene Fenninger, IV(pty:pla), Attorney Robert W. Rock added to party Eugene Fenninger, III(pty:pla) (Rock, Robert) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' #10 Proposed Scheduling Order, the Court has determined that a scheduling conference is necessary. Accordingly, a Scheduling Conference is SET for November 7, 2022 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted entirely BY VIDEO, and all necessary parties SHALL attend by that means. Please see the attached instructions on how to participate by video means. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 10/19/22. Text Only Entry (mdblc2)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)and (b), this matter is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge:(1) To convene a scheduling conference under FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b), enter a SchedulingOrder that satisfies the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, and enter such orders asappropriate to enforce the Scheduling order and resolve discovery matters; provided, furtherthat the scheduling conference, the Magistrate Judge shall advise the parties of JudgeBlackburns practice standards found at www.cod.uscourts.gov.;(2) To hear and finally determine non-dispositive matters that have been referred,subject to the exceptions found in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A); and(3) To hear and make recommendations on dispositive matters that have been referredas defined in 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A).Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLOLCivR 16.6. Onthe recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the partiesby motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, asettlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/19/2022. Text Only Entry (rebsec)
|
| Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #9 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-02292-REB. (Text Only Entry) (csarr, ) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Christopher M. Wilson. (Volker, Luke) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Christopher M. Wilson All parties do not consent.. (Volker, Luke) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Christopher M. Wilson.(Dagner, Deana) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Consent Form due by 10/18/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 10/18/2022. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 9/7/2022. (evaug )
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons, Complaint, District Court Civil Cover Sheet upon Christopher Wilson on 8/4/22 (norlin, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Christopher M Wilson, filed by Eugene IV Fenninger, Eugene III Fenninger.(norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Christopher M Wilson from Ell Paso County District Court, Case Number 2022CV30589. (Filing fee $ 402, Receipt Number ACODC-8642429), filed by Christopher M Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L)(Dagner, Deana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
