Sorensen v. Roark et al
| Terry Sorensen |
| Jerry Roark, Maureen Sheridan, Robert Shepard, Donny Britton, Donald Trujillo, Mark Fairbairn, Shane Corey, Omar Mendoza, Jerry (I) Roark, Maureen (I) Sheridan, Robert (I) Shepard, Donny (I) Britton, Donald (I) Trujillo, Mark (I) Fairbairn, Shane (I) Corey and Omar (I) Mendoza |
| 1:2022cv02322 |
| September 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE pursuant to #5 Order of Recusal. Case randomly drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-02322-NYW-SKC.(Text Only Entry) (csarr, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on September 21, 2022. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that I RECUSE myself from this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455(a). It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall cause this case to be reassigned to another Magistrate Judge. (csarr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 9/19/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc3, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DRAWING CASE. The Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c); D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge. By Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 9/13/2022. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-02322-NYW. (sdunb, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8648196)Attorney Igor Raykin added to party Terry Sorensen(pty:pla), filed by Terry Sorensen.(Raykin, Igor) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
