Barrack v. United States Department of State
| Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. |
| United States Department of State |
| 1:2022cv02426 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Kristen L Mix |
| Raymond P Moore |
| Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant United States Department of State. (Scott, Olivia) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant United States Department of State. United States Department of State answer due 11/16/2022. (Scott, Olivia) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court sua sponte. In his Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief under the Freedom of Information Act #1 , Plaintiff seeks, inter alia, an order requiring Defendant to expeditiously process his requests for documents, within ten days. Although Plaintiff has not filed a motion for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order in this case, his relief is functionally the same. To the extent he seeks such relief in his Complaint as a substitute for such a motion, that request is DENIED for the same reasons stated at the telephonic status conference held on August 5, 2022, in Barrack v. United States Department of Justice, No. 22-cv-01800-RM, in which his request for an expedited preliminary injunction was denied. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/27/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/27/2022. (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Pursuant to D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 40.1(a), and as approved by the Chief Judge of the Court, the undersigned directs that the Clerk of the Court reassign this action to Magistrate Judge Gallagher as the referral judge. All further pleadings in this case shall reflect the case number of 22-cv-02426-RM-GPG. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/27/2022. (sdunb, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Joseph C. Haupt on behalf of Thomas J. Barrack, JrAttorney Joseph C. Haupt added to party Thomas J. Barrack, Jr(pty:pla) (Haupt, Joseph) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: With the assignment of this matter, the parties are advised that throughout this case they are expected to be familiar and comply with not only the Local Rules of this District, but also Judge Raymond P. Moore's Civil Practice Standards, which may be found at: http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/JudicialOfficers/ActiveArticleIIIJudges/HonRaymondPMoore.aspx. SO ORDERED by Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/20/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 9/20/2022. (Text Only Entry) (rmsec )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Raymond P. Moore and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Under the Freedom of Information Act against United States Department of State (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8666178)Attorney Jason R. Dunn added to party Thomas J. Barrack, Jr(pty:pla), filed by Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- First Request, #2 Exhibit 2- Email 6-29-22, #3 Exhibit 3- First Acknowledgement, #4 Exhibit 4- Second Request, #5 Exhibit 5- Second Acknowledgement, #6 Exhibit 6- OIPS Letter 1, #7 Exhibit 7- OIPS Letter 2, #8 Exhibit 8- Third Request, #9 Summons To the Attorney General, #10 Summons To the Department of State, #11 Summons To the US Attorney- Colorado, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dunn, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barrack v. United States Department of State | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Jason R. Dunn |
| Represented By: | Joseph C. Haupt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Department of State | |
| Represented By: | Olivia R. Hussey Scott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
