Cuesta v. Denver Hotels, LLC
| Carlos Cuesta |
| Denver Hotels, LLC doing business as Best Western Plus Executive Residency Denver Central Park Hotel |
| 1:2022cv02527 |
| September 28, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Michael E Hegarty |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 17 November 2022. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses #9 is granted. Although Defendant has not yet filed a response, the Court finds that further briefing would not materially assist in the Motion's adjudication. See D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1(d). Plaintiff shall file his Motion to Strike on or before November 22, 2022.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM regarding #9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to STRIKE DEFENDANTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. Motion #9 is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 11/16/2022. Text Only Entry (cnssec.) |
| Filing 11 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to STRIKE DEFENDANTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed by attorney Anthony J. Perez. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Manage my Account tab at the PACER website at https://www.pacer.gov/, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (sphil, ) |
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to STRIKE DEFENDANTS AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Plaintiff Carlos Cuesta. (Perez, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Pimal A. Patel added to party Denver Hotels, LLC(pty:dft) by Denver Hotels, LLC.(Patel, Pimal) |
|
Filing 7
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 19 October 2022. Due to a scheduling conflict with the Court, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) scheduling conference currently set for December 20, 2022 is vacated and rescheduled for December 20, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom A-501, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carlos Cuesta. Denver Hotels, LLC served on 10/3/2022, answer due 10/24/2022. (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 5
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 29 September 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/13/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 12/20/2022 10:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/28/2022. Text Only Entry (cnssec. )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Text Only Entry. (jcharl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Denver Hotels, LLC D/B/A Best Western Plus Executive Residency Denver Central Park Hotel (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8680989)Attorney Anthony J. Perez added to party Carlos Cuesta(pty:pla), filed by Carlos Cuesta. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cuesta v. Denver Hotels, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos Cuesta | |
| Represented By: | Anthony J. Perez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Denver Hotels, LLC doing business as Best Western Plus Executive Residency Denver Central Park Hotel | |
| Represented By: | Pimal A. Patel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
