Medical Practice Management Group, LLC v. Gordon
Plaintiff: Medical Practice Management Group, LLC
Defendant: Robert Gordon
Case Number: 1:2022cv02585
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Kristen L Mix
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2022 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Medical Practice Management Group, LLC. (Jones, William)
November 29, 2022 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Medical Practice Management Group, LLC. Robert Gordon served on 11/9/2022, answer due 11/30/2022. (Jones, William)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10 November 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 1/25/2023. Scheduling Conference set for 2/1/2023 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document, #3 Continuation of Main Document) (cmadr, ) Modified to correct filing date on 11/14/2022 (cmadr, ).
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/19/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
October 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: Upon review of the #9 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Plaintiff, the Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has met its burden of establishing complete diversity of citizenship in this case. Accordingly, the #7 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/19/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
October 19, 2022 Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #7 by Plaintiff Medical Practice Management Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Sevy, Tanya)
October 6, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Tanya Ann Sevy on behalf of Medical Practice Management Group, LLCAttorney Tanya Ann Sevy added to party Medical Practice Management Group, LLC(pty:pla) (Sevy, Tanya)
October 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DISCHARGED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE on or before October 19, 2022 why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/5/2022. (trvo, ) Modified on 10/20/2022 to discharge pursuant to 10 Order (trvo, ).
October 5, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (trvo, )
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Robert Gordon by Plaintiff Medical Practice Management Group, LLC. (Jones, William)
October 3, 2022 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No Summons issued. (tgall, )
October 3, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Text Only Entry. (tgall, )
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jones, William)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Monetary Damages against Robert Gordon (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8693700)Attorney William Frederick Jones added to party Medical Practice Management Group, LLC(pty:pla), filed by Medical Practice Management Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Jones, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medical Practice Management Group, LLC v. Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Medical Practice Management Group, LLC
Represented By: William Frederick Jones
Represented By: Tanya Ann Sevy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?