Felix v. Kaibo LLC
| Steven Daniel Felix |
| Kaibo LLC |
| 1:2022cv02666 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on #6 Order Setting Deadline For Filing Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent To Magistrate Jurisdiction Form And Setting Scheduling Conference. Pursuant to that Order, 1. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties shall complete and file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, available from the Courts website at www.cod.uscourts.gov, on or before December 7, 2022.To date, the Court has not received the required Consent form. Please promptly file. Failure to do so may result in the Scheduling Conference set for 12/21/2022 being vacated, or other appropriate remedies. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/8/22. Text Only Entry (stvlc3, Andrew)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Plaintiff Steven Daniel Felix. (Tharpe, Richard) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ELECTION CONCERNING CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION FORM AND SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 13 October 2022. Consent Form due by 12/7/2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/14/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 12/21/2022 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (athom, ) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-02666-STV. (athom, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (tgall, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kaibo LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8711513)Attorney Richard Bruce Tharpe added to party Steven Daniel Felix(pty:pla), filed by Steven Daniel Felix. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Tharpe, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Felix v. Kaibo LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Daniel Felix | |
| Represented By: | Richard Bruce Tharpe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kaibo LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
