USA v. AR15 Auto Sear Machine Gun, Unknown Manufacturer, Unknown Caliber, Serial No. 059
| USA |
| AR15 Auto Sear Machine Gun, Unknown Manufacturer, Unknown Caliber, Serial No. 059 |
| 1:2022cv02764 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| S Kato Crews |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 0924 Civil Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WARRANT FOR ARREST OF PROPERTY IN REM issued. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER FOR WARRANT FOR ARREST OF PROPERTY IN REM by Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews on 9 December 2022. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Complaint for Forfeiture by Plaintiff USA (Bohn, Kurt) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/21/2022. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against AR15 Auto Sear Machine Gun, Unknown Manufacturer, Unknown Caliber, Serial No. 059 Attorney Kurt J. Bohn added to party USA(pty:pla), filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #2 Warrant for Arrest of Property, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bohn, Kurt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: USA v. AR15 Auto Sear Machine Gun, Unknown Manufacturer, Unknown Caliber, Serial No. 059 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: USA | |
| Represented By: | Kurt J. Bohn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AR15 Auto Sear Machine Gun, Unknown Manufacturer, Unknown Caliber, Serial No. 059 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
