Meggs et al v. Northglenn LLC
Plaintiff: John Meggs and Access 4 All, Inc.
Defendant: Northglenn LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv02791
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Scott T Varholak
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 12/22/2022 is VACATED and RESET for 2/2/2023 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. The Proposed Scheduling Order is due on or before 1/26/2023. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/15/2022. Text Only Entry(stvlc4, )
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order and Continuance of the Scheduling Conference filed by Access 4 All, Inc., John Meggs. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/15/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
November 15, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order and Continuance of the Scheduling Conference by Plaintiffs Access 4 All, Inc., John Meggs. (Shadinger, Jon)
November 15, 2022 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Meggs, Access 4 All, Inc.. Northglenn LLC waiver sent on 11/9/2022, answer due 1/8/2023. (Shadinger, Jon)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 26 October 2022. Proposed Scheduling Order due12/15/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 12/22/2022 10:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (cmadr, )
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/26/2022. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
October 24, 2022 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE by Senior Judge Blackburn. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. All future pleadings should be designated as 22-cv-02791-NYW. (athom, )
October 24, 2022 Filing 5 Exhibits in Support Exhibit A for Plaintiffs' Complaint by Plaintiffs Access 4 All, Inc., John Meggs. (Shadinger, Jon)
October 24, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (jtorr, )
October 24, 2022 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
October 24, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Shadinger, Jon)
October 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Northglenn LLC (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8736044)Attorney Jon G. Shadinger, Jr added to party Access 4 All, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Jon G. Shadinger, Jr added to party John Meggs(pty:pla), filed by John Meggs, Access 4 All, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shadinger, Jon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meggs et al v. Northglenn LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Meggs
Represented By: Jon G. Shadinger, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Access 4 All, Inc.
Represented By: Jon G. Shadinger, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northglenn LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?