Warsame v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| MOHAMED H. WARSAME |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Eva Rupp |
| 1:2022cv02800 |
| October 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 0336 ( Judicial Review of Naturalization Denials) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Civil Case Terminated on 12 December 2022. Text Only Entry (cmadr, ) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice #8 , which is self-effectuating pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate this case. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/12/22`. Text Only Entry (stvlc3, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to the consent of the parties to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge #7 , this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/12/2022. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Plaintiff Mohamed H. Warsame (Hacking, James) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Eva Rupp, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services All parties consent.. (Deuschle, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nicholas Albert Deuschle on behalf of Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Eva Rupp, United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesAttorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Ur Mendoza Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Eva Rupp(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft) (Deuschle, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed upon defendant(s) Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 10/31/2022, answer due 12/30/2022; Eva Rupp served on 10/31/2022, answer due 12/30/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 10/31/2022, answer due 12/30/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Receipts)(Hacking, James) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER This matter is before the Court on #5 Case Assignment. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties shall complete and file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, available from the Court's website at www.cod.uscourts.gov, on or before 12/8/2022. It is FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is set for a Status Conference on 12/22/2022 at 10:45 in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. SO ORDERED Text Only Entry (stvlc3, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Eva Rupp, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 402,Receipt Number ACODC-8737981)Attorney James O. Hacking, III added to party MOHAMED H. WARSAME(pty:pla), filed by MOHAMED H. WARSAME. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USCIS, #3 Summons Jaddou, #4 Summons Rupp, #5 Summons Att. General, #6 Summons US Att.)(Hacking, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
